Monday 26 October 2015

paper no 4
Topic. Indian village in kanthapura
click here to evaluate my assignment

                           2015-2016
Name            - Vala jyotsna Tanshukhbhai
   Semester      - 1 (one)
   Roll No          -42
   Topic             - Indian village in kanthapura.
   Work             - Assignment
   Paper            - Course no- 4 (four)
   Email id        - valajyotsna7@gmail.com
   Submitted by –
                             Smt. S.B. Gardi Maharaja Krishnakumar Sinhji Bhavnagar Uni.Dep. Of English. 
  

Indian village in kanthapura                                                                            Introduction
                   ‘Kanthapura’ is one of the famous novel by Raja Rao. He was born in 8 November 1908 Hassan, Mysore, India and died in 8 July 2006. He is famous for Novel, Short Story and Essay. Whose works deeply rooted in Hinduism. The Serpent  and the Rope (1960) a semiautobiographical novel recounting a search for spiritual truth in Europe and India, established him as one of the finest India prose stylists and won him the Sathiya Academy  Award in 1964. For the entire body of his work, Raja Rao was awarded the Neustadt International prize for literature in 1988.
                     Rao’s wide ranging body of work, Spanning a number of work, is seen as a varied and significant contribution to Indian English Literature, as well as world literature.

                                                                                                                                                                                              

                       His Notable Work
                     1).Kanthapura (1938).
                           2).The Serpent and the Rope (1960).
                      
                   Raja Rao’s first novel “Kanthapura” is the story of a village in south Indian name Kanthapura. The novel is narrated in the form of a “Sthalapurana” by an old woman of the village, Achakka.

                             Kanthapura is a traditional caste ridden Indian village which is away from all modern ways of living. Dominant castes like Brahmins are privileged to get the best region of the village whereas sudras pariahs are marginalized. The village is believed to have protected by a local deity called Kenchamma. Through casteism the village has got a long nourished traditions of festivals in which all castes interact and the village are united. 
      
     Social background of Novel:
                In Kanthapura novel Raja Rao expertise, society of Indian what they believe culture and religious political etc… Kanthapura Novel show the society because in Indian society rules are very difficult and hardy followed.
                Writer wanted to show the mirror of Indian society background, Bhatt’s Other social considerations hardly go farther. As for them tees
said the better. Bhatia was the only one who would have nothing to do with those ganglia bhagans  he wouldn’t have the city trouble in Kanthapura. On anodynes besides his business construal he onward to government patron age. He was also the elation agents and got two thousand for it. But Bataa fellow this bhatta the remark made earlier in the  novel has its overtones of indignation castinas in our attitude towels him.
                And here writer put the image of Kanthapura who we real whole novel the same time we realized before society belong all spirit. Kanthapura name of villager it was very old and their peoples uneducated and blindly believe anything villager a siring bajan all songs and religious idea if image very old idea of raja Rao.
                General Indian believed poor idea and reach religious the society rules were more hardly to followed people. And Kanthapura is good expressed idea of social value Indian cultural extent political even etc…
        The novel has a dormant pattern to the treatment of caster and communities of any Kanthapura a village representative of any other village in south India.
                In the beginning of the novel we endanger the whole village stratified and hierarchies on the basis of caste creed and religion,
                “Earlier in India Brahmin are major of role
                Of in society and they were more religious
                And idealized in society all other communist’s
                People believed in Brahmin cast. And casteism
                Also main part of the society.”
                                         When novel organizes an open meeting to garner support to get moorthy out of jail sends old man in turban belonging to upper caste flares up against all Gandhi an stuff of caste mixing. The whole image also expressed the idea of society in kanthapura novel because that time of cast mixing.
                                            In kanthapura novel based on social even and try to repressed to truth by Raja Rao he warded to explain their idolize and uneducated people and also political even are main them of novel kanthapura. And background based was very mixed.
               
                     Woman Condition in Society
                           The anther point is the oppression of women by men. As it is discussed earlier that Indian is a land of great tradition and culture woman is portrayed as an embodiment of sacrifice and they are thought the virtues to be develop to become an ideal Indian woman. The tradition patriarchal framework experts a lot from a woman. During the time of general construction. The girl child aqueous pre-knowledge of her rights and responsibilities and role and relations to be observable at both the natal as well as in law’s home and gets that in such a way that the girls.
                                     It also another large of oppression the oppression of widow in the society their oppression was more in Brahmin community the woman who lost her husband had to save her head and wear only white sari.
                                         They would not be allowed to participate in any good events and they could not come before anybody who was leaving his house for work or for any good events. If he happened to see a widow while leaving his house, it was consider ill women.
                                           Women condition very difficult and men central character in society.
                                             The fiction character Ran gamma in this novel resembles the character of Rama in reality, Rama was the founder of Aria Mahila was Sabah. As early in 1882 she fought against male domination in the society and she founded saradha. Saradha in Mahila Sabah she organized a lost of meeting for women and through her revolutionary talk she made them realize the they should be independent and come out of the walls built around them and come out of the walls built around them and especially she demanded freedom for widows to decide their life and remarriage. It was unacceptable and she was critiqued badly for her speeches. She real all the puranas. Epics Vedas and Literature and found that there was no justice for woman in anything.
                                  In Indian society more difference of other countries even now a day also not more changes through.
                                   In novel main points are societies of kanthapura politician religious colonies etc. Main themes are the novel kanthapura. Well I read book at that time and I find kanthapura village quite same even today villages and it also sow image of myth and Raja Rao view of colonies and Englishmen.
                                   Kanthapura is the first major Indian novel in English by Raja Rao. The novel deals with the civil disobedience movement of 1930.
                                  Mahatma Gandhi on the participation of a small village of south Indian in the national struggle calls for the story’s central concern.
                                 The villagers sacrifice all their material possessions in a triumph of the spirit.
                             It shows how the people of country united at the time of movement and joined at the nonviolence movement to bring independence from the British.
                            Achakka narrator the whole story. She is an old village woman and the story revolves around in a village kanthapura in south India.
                         In this village there are clear discrimination between Brahman sudra and parish quarters still the mutual bonding between the villagers are very strong and they live happily with equal social and economical bonding.
                    Rao depicts beautifully the participation of the villagers in different festivals like Dussera, puja ganesh jayanti etc…. 
                        The story of the Nobel belongs to kanthapura, a small village in remote corner of south India.
                      The people here were mostly poor illiterate and backward. 
                     The village was caste ridden with different quarters in it housing people of different castes the highest cast being Brahmin the lowest the pariahs.
                    People were extremely religious minded goddess kenchamma was the president deity of the village.
                       The protagonist of the novel is a young Brahmin boy named moorthy staunch follower of Gandhi.
                            Once this boy found a half buried lingo in the village. He dig it out installed it at another plays and buits a temple there. This temple becomes the center of social life in the village. Moorthy arranged various religious ceremony and kathas here. Once katha mum jayaramachar mixed political propagandas in his kathas. The foreign governments   got a wind of this and arrested him. A polish man bode khan was posted in the village, to keep an eyes on the going on there. Being a mohmmendan he could get no accommodation in the village the sahip of the neighboring skeffington.
                        Coffee instead opened a hut for him and logged him in the estate. The congress committee of the nearby karwar city costumed moorthy. He came back to the village looks of congress literature and spring wear home. Span khaddar discard the foreign cloths and thus stop theconomic exploitation of Indians by foreigners.
                                  Conclusion
                      The novel starts with simple narration by an old woman about one of the village in India, later it evolves to entire India. The narration starts as tale is told to children by their grandmother as it is the Indian tradition. Raja Rao has combined the myth for authentication of his work by putting myth in novel he easily achieved his goal. Not only the use of myth makes it popular but, his intellectual power, his imaginative power, his ability to use and utilize the Indian the Indian and it’s his knowledge of Indian culture and people.

Paper no:-4
Topic - Indian Village in Kanthapura
click here to evaluate my assignment
2015-2016
Name            - Vala jyotsna Tanshukhbhai
   Semester      - 1 (one)
   Roll No          -42
   Topic             - Indian village in kanthapura.
   Work             - Assignment
   Paper            - Course no- 4 (four)
   Email id        - valajyotsna7@gmail.com
   Submitted by –
                             Smt. S.B. Gardi Maharaja Krishnakumar Sinhji Bhavnagar Uni.Dep. Of English. 
  

Indian village in kanthapura                                                                            Introduction
                   ‘Kanthapura’ is one of the famous novel by Raja Rao. He was born in 8 November 1908 Hassan, Mysore, India and died in 8 July 2006. He is famous for Novel, Short Story and Essay. Whose works deeply rooted in Hinduism. The Serpent  and the Rope (1960) a semi-autobiographical novel recounting a search for spiritual truth in Europe and India, established him as one of the finest India prose stylists and won him the Sathiya Academy  Award in 1964. For the entire body of his work, Raja Rao was awarded the Neustadt International prize for literature in 1988.
                     Rao’s wide ranging body of work, Spanning a number of work, is seen as a varied and significant contribution to Indian English Literature, as well as world literature.

                                                                                                                                                                                              

                       His Notable Work
                     1).Kanthapura (1938).
                           2).The Serpent and the Rope (1960).
                      
                   Raja Rao’s first novel “Kanthapura” is the story of a village in south Indian name Kanthapura. The novel is narrated in the form of a “Sthalapurana” by an old woman of the village, Achakka.

                             Kanthapura is a traditional caste ridden Indian village which is away from all modern ways of living. Dominant castes like Brahmins are privileged to get the best region of the village whereas sudras pariahs are marginalized. The village is believed to have protected by a local deity called Kenchamma. Through casteism the village has got a long nourished traditions of festivals in which all castes interact and the village are united. 
      
     Social background of Novel:
                In Kanthapura novel Raja Rao expertise, society of Indian what they believe culture and religious political etc… Kanthapura Novel show the society because in Indian society rules are very difficult and hardy followed.
                Writer wanted to show the mirror of Indian society background, Bhatt’s Other social considerations hardly go farther. As for them tees
said the better. Bhatia was the only one who would have nothing to do with those ganglia bhagans  he wouldn’t have the city trouble in Kanthapura. On anodynes besides his business construal he onward to government patron age. He was also the elation agents and got two thousand for it. But Bataa fellow this bhatta the remark made earlier in the  novel has its overtones of indignation castinas in our attitude towels him.
                And here writer put the image of Kanthapura who we real whole novel the same time we realized before society belong all spirit. Kanthapura name of villager it was very old and their peoples uneducated and blindly believe anything villager a siring bajan all songs and religious idea if image very old idea of raja Rao.
                General Indian believed poor idea and reach religious the society rules were more hardly to followed people. And Kanthapura is good expressed idea of social value Indian cultural extent political even etc…
        The novel has a dormant pattern to the treatment of caster and communities of any Kanthapura a village representative of any other village in south India.
                In the beginning of the novel we endanger the whole village stratified and hierarchies on the basis of caste creed and religion,
                “Earlier in India Brahmin are major of role
                Of in society and they were more religious
                And idealized in society all other communist’s
                People believed in Brahmin cast. And casteism
                Also main part of the society.”
                                         When novel organizes an open meeting to garner support to get moorthy out of jail sends old man in turban belonging to upper caste flares up against all Gandhi an stuff of caste mixing. The whole image also expressed the idea of society in kanthapura novel because that time of cast mixing.
                                            In kanthapura novel based on social even and try to repressed to truth by Raja Rao he warded to explain their idolize and uneducated people and also political even are main them of novel kanthapura. And background based was very mixed.
               
                     Woman Condition in Society
                           The anther point is the oppression of women by men. As it is discussed earlier that Indian is a land of great tradition and culture woman is portrayed as an embodiment of sacrifice and they are thought the virtues to be develop to become an ideal Indian woman. The tradition patriarchal framework experts a lot from a woman. During the time of general construction. The girl child aqueous pre-knowledge of her rights and responsibilities and role and relations to be observable at both the natal as well as in law’s home and gets that in such a way that the girls.
                                     It also another large of oppression the oppression of widow in the society their oppression was more in Brahmin community the woman who lost her husband had to save her head and wear only white sari.
                                         They would not be allowed to participate in any good events and they could not come before anybody who was leaving his house for work or for any good events. If he happened to see a widow while leaving his house, it was consider ill women.
                                           Women condition very difficult and men central character in society.
                                             The fiction character Ran gamma in this novel resembles the character of Rama in reality, Rama was the founder of Aria Mahila was Sabah. As early in 1882 she fought against male domination in the society and she founded saradha. Saradha in Mahila Sabah she organized a lost of meeting for women and through her revolutionary talk she made them realize the they should be independent and come out of the walls built around them and come out of the walls built around them and especially she demanded freedom for widows to decide their life and remarriage. It was unacceptable and she was critiqued badly for her speeches. She real all the puranas. Epics Vedas and Literature and found that there was no justice for woman in anything.
                                  In Indian society more difference of other countries even now a day also not more changes through.
                                   In novel main points are societies of kanthapura politician religious colonies etc. Main themes are the novel kanthapura. Well I read book at that time and I find kanthapura village quite same even today villages and it also sow image of myth and Raja Rao view of colonies and Englishmen.
                                   Kanthapura is the first major Indian novel in English by Raja Rao. The novel deals with the civil disobedience movement of 1930.
                                  Mahatma Gandhi on the participation of a small village of south Indian in the national struggle calls for the story’s central concern.
                                 The villagers sacrifice all their material possessions in a triumph of the spirit.
                             It shows how the people of country united at the time of movement and joined at the nonviolence movement to bring independence from the British.
                            Achakka narrator the whole story. She is an old village woman and the story revolves around in a village kanthapura in south India.
                         In this village there are clear discrimination between Brahman sudra and parish quarters still the mutual bonding between the villagers are very strong and they live happily with equal social and economical bonding.
                    Rao depicts beautifully the participation of the villagers in different festivals like Dussera, puja ganesh jayanti etc…. 
                        The story of the Nobel belongs to kanthapura, a small village in remote corner of south India.
                      The people here were mostly poor illiterate and backward. 
                     The village was caste ridden with different quarters in it housing people of different castes the highest cast being Brahmin the lowest the pariahs.
                    People were extremely religious minded goddess kenchamma was the president deity of the village.
                       The protagonist of the novel is a young Brahmin boy named moorthy staunch follower of Gandhi.
                            Once this boy found a half buried lingo in the village. He dig it out installed it at another plays and buits a temple there. This temple becomes the center of social life in the village. Moorthy arranged various religious ceremony and kathas here. Once katha mum jayaramachar mixed political propagandas in his kathas. The foreign governments   got a wind of this and arrested him. A polish man bode khan was posted in the village, to keep an eyes on the going on there. Being a mohmmendan he could get no accommodation in the village the sahip of the neighboring skeffington.
                        Coffee instead opened a hut for him and logged him in the estate. The congress committee of the nearby karwar city costumed moorthy. He came back to the village looks of congress literature and spring wear home. Span khaddar discard the foreign cloths and thus stop theconomic exploitation of Indians by foreigners.
                                  Conclusion
                      The novel starts with simple narration by an old woman about one of the village in India, later it evolves to entire India. The narration starts as tale is told to children by their grandmother as it is the Indian tradition. Raja Rao has combined the myth for authentication of his work by putting myth in novel he easily achieved his goal. Not only the use of myth makes it popular but, his intellectual power, his imaginative power, his ability to use and utilize the Indian the Indian and it’s his knowledge of Indian culture and people.


                                       


                       




                       
                       

                       


    
           



Sunday 25 October 2015

My Presentation Sem 1

CRITICISM - NATURE OF CRITICISM & FUNCTION

paper-3
Title-Criticism-Nature of Criticism&Function
To evaluate my assignment click here
2015-2016

NAME                                        :- VALA JYOTSNA TANSHUKHBHAI
SEMESTER                               :- 1(ONE)
ROLL NO.                                 :-  42
TOPIC                                        :- CRITICISM - NATURE OF
                                                      CRITICISM & FUNCTION
WORK                                       :- ASSIGNMENT
PAPER                                       :- 3 (three)

SUBMITTED BY                      :-
                               Smt. S.B.Gardi Maharaja Krishnakumar Sinhji, Bhavnagar Uni. Dep. Of Eng.





* Criticism - Nature Of Criticism a various function.
What is Criticism ?
         
          Criticism is a kind of bridge between author and reader It brings the reader the other and inner beauty of work literature criticism defines, classify and evaluate the work of literature.

Definitions of criticism :-
         
          "The Art of interpreting art"
                                         - Walter pater.
          "The Critic is an Interpreter between the inspired and the uninspired."
                                                                                             - Thomas Carlyle.

          "The First Duty of a critic is to make a disinterested endeavor to learn and pagates the best that Is known and thought in the world"
                                                                                             - Methew Arrold .

          "The good critic is the who narrates the adventure of his soul among masterpiece".
                                                                                             - Anatale France.

          The Critic explains the full meaning and value of a  work to those who can not grasp them without his help. In this contact a superior between the author  and critic ? undoubtly the author is superior to the critic because no critic can eaist of function without the creative artist.


The Major Function Of Critic :-

          The basic function of good critic is to appreciate and evaluate a literary work. A critic is a link between the without and the reader. the explain and expresses the inner meaning and emotional depth of a literary work.
          The critic is a kind of guide and torch bearor to enlighten the reader. is to arrive and express a meaningful judgment of value a good critic should be imporsial  in evaluating the literary work.

·      Qualification of critic :-

          A good critic must have some special qualification. . . .
·      He must be great scholar.
·      He must have good knowledge.
·      A good critic must be highly sensitive.
·      He Must be highly imaginative emotional and intellectual.
·      He should be absolutely from any prejudice.

The Function of criticism Follows.
[1]      Judgement.
[2]      Evalution.
[3]      Elucidation.
[4]      Interpretation.
[5]      Revalution.


[1] Judgement :-
          Judgement is the first function of criticism. A critic is not and abstract law-giver. The judgement in literature is not like the judgement of the judicial judicial judgement are not revocable critic's judgement is revocable. There is nothing absolutely valid or utterly valid in criticism. The Judgement are dynamic not static.
          Judgement are two critics may differ. a poet may be Famous in one age but he may lose his fame in the next generation.
          During his life time of pope he was greatly admined to be the greatest poet. after his death critic began to question whether pope was a poet at all.
          Another problem with literary judgement is that it is very difficult to judge a contemporary writer. It is difficult to pass judgement when he is live and still writing. His total creation should be taken in to consideration before passing a final judgement critic must. have a flexible mind and unblessed criticism aims at brining out the qualities of literature created by an individual writer.
          A critic therefore has the responsibility to the reader as he has the responsibility to the writer.
          A critic should be very good student learn so many things from criticism. A good critic can direct the writer to words better creation.

[2] Evaluation :-
          Evaluation means finding out the place of the work of art in literature. The critic is supposed to be a good student of the literature of the past as well as of the present.
          He can bring out the contribution of the artist and determine his position in the history of literature. It go happens that these evaluation also go on changing.

          The position fixed by the critic is not final. popularity of the writer is not the standard to judge his greatness. His work should have the quality of Permanace.
          The critic concentrates on the total work of the artist and analyses his total contribution. Evaluation id s tough job. that requires much toll on the part of the critic

[3]      Elucidation :-
          Elucidation means an analysis. It is not simply dissection the critic has to understand the general theory of art and apply it to the particular work at hand.
          Elucidation is analysis and exposition. The critic should be a good student of art and beauty.
          He should examine the companants of the work of art from the paint of view of the aristie value. He has to find out the beauty and bring them to the notice of the reader.

[4]      Interpretation :-
          Interpretation means finding out the meaning from the literary piece.
          The poet has his own method of expressing truth. The critic dives into the mind of the poet and tries to find out the real Meaning.
          A critic is a good friend of the reader as well as to the artist in this way. he makes explicit all that is implicit in the work of art.
          He Paints out the impartants areas, explains the symbols and bring forth the real meaning of the theme.
          A critic must have a great insight into the use of language be and style. He must have a good knowledge  of imagery and symbols.
          The critic must poetic sensibility to understand appreciate literature. In this respect poet and the critic are similar pope says :-
"Both from heaven derive their
right. These born to judge as
well as those to write."

[5]      Revalution :-
          values in literature go on changing. The poet is not always great. His fame might decline in the different context.
          The critic's mind should free from all traditional consideration. He must have new ideas and new interpretations. he must not be a slave to the old judgement. The critic must be able to deseriminate - permanent things from the temporary one.
          This will also enable him to re-assess  his work and change the old judgement. To revoke old judgement requires great courage.
          Revaluation is necessary in case of many poets and writers. criticism aims at that also along with other functions.

Critic Must be Disinterested :-

          Arnold says emphasis the word disinterested. The critic must be absolutely impartial without any prejudices against or in favour of any particular author or literary school.
          A good critic should be disinterestedly impartial in evaluating and imparting judgement or an author or a literary work. Mathew Arnold say that. . . .

" A good critic Is make a disinterested endeavor to learn and propagate the best that is known and thought in the world"

          The Next Function of the critic is " To make a best ideas of prevail". In this respect the critic is disenory so his next function is to prepare an atmosphere favourable for the production of creative literature.

          The critic as a man of culture should be conserned with all aspect of living. In brief the function of the critic Is to promote culture to knowledge of latter. he is motivated by moral and social passion for doing good.

To evaluate my assignment click here